by H. Sterling Burnett
The Heartland Institute
Even in sun-baked, hyper-environmentalist, wildfire-ravaged California, residents are not willing to pay even minimal amounts to avert alleged climate change. That’s the result of a poll conducted by the Ventura County Board of Supervisors, as reported by The Heartland Institute.
“New Poll Shows Californians Won’t Support Small Climate Tax” Read Full Article »
Climate Depot
Climate Depot cites 13 years of Pew Research data that shows climate changes consistently ranks near the bottom as a priority for U.S. voters. These findings come even as media repeatedly claim the earth will be incinerated by continued use of fossil fuels.
““Climate Change still ranks as low priority”” Read Full Article »
by Peter Murphy
CFACT
“According to research by “climate experts” published earlier this month by the journal Nature Climate Change, global warming-caused sea level rise ‘could result in the near extinction of almost half of the world’s sandy beaches by the end of the century.’ Then again, maybe not,” according to CFACT.
“Will global warming erode our beaches away?” Read Full Article »
by James Kamis
Climate Change Dispatch
“In summary, evidence substantiates that a well-defined, persistent and non-moving ocean warm trend originating off the East Coast of the United States is the result of super-heated and methane enriched fluids emitted from numerous seafloor hydrothermal vents/hot springs. This has far-reaching implications concerning the root cause of current worldwide ocean warming,” according to a story by the Climate Change Dispatch.
“Geologic Heat Linked To East Coast Ocean Warming Trend” Read Full Article »
by Bonner R. Cohen
The Heartland Institute
“The agricultural gains from the fertilization effect of increasing carbon dioxide levels may produce benefits greater than any harms generated by climate change, a new study shows,” according to The Heartland Institute.”
“STUDY: AG BENEFITS OF CARBON DIOXIDE ARE UNDERSTATED IN CLIMATE MODELS” Read Full Article »
by Tiffany Taylor
The Heartland Institute
“Prince Charles is fond of lecturing commoners about how we need to sacrifice our lifestyles to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, but he is dealing with a royal case of embarrassment after having been exposed hypocritically jaunting around the world in private jets and helicopters,” according to The Heartland Institute.
“Prince of Hypocrisy: Charles Racks Up Private Flight Miles, CO2 Emissions” Read Full Article »
by Drew Johnson
Washington Examiner
“European leaders have spent years trying and pointedly failing to solve the climate crisis with regulation. Whether intentionally or not, U.S. policymakers have mostly avoided top-down solutions. And counterintuitively, or perhaps it should have been intuitive, the U.S. now leads the developed world in reducing carbon emissions,” according the the Washington Examiner.
“Unlike in Europe, the US approach to climate change is actually working” Read Full Article »
by Nicolas Loris
The Heritage Foundation
“By shrinking our economy by potentially tens of trillions of dollars, the Green New Deal will cause lower levels of prosperity and fewer resources to deal with whatever environmental challenges come our way. That’s a bad deal for our economy and our environment,” according to Nicolas Loris, Deputy Director of The Heritage Foundation’s Thomas A. Roe Institute.
“It’s Not Just About Cost. The Green New Deal Is Bad Environmental Policy, Too” Read Full Article »
by Idso, Singer, Soon
Heartland Institute
As the Heartland Institute says on its website, “The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) is an international panel of nongovernment scientists and scholars who have come together to present a comprehensive, authoritative, and realistic assessment of the science and economics of global warming. Because it is not a government agency, and because its members are not predisposed to believe climate change is caused by human greenhouse gas emissions, NIPCC is able to offer an independent “second opinion” of the evidence reviewed – or not reviewed – by the [UN’s] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on the issue of global warming.”
“Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science” Read Full Article »
by Gerald E. Marsh
CHICAGO — Contrary to the conventional wisdom of the day, the real danger facing humanity is not global warming, but more likely the coming of a new Ice Age.
by Gerald E. Marsh
The sun’s role in the earth’s recent warming remains controversial even though there is a good deal of evidence to support the thesis that solar variations are a very significant factor in driving climate change both currently and in the past. The author offers a simple, phenomenological approach for estimating the actual—as opposed to model dependent—magnitude of the sun’s influence on climate.
by Gerald E. Marsh
The purpose of this primer is to help the reader determine whether our understanding of the earth’s climate is adequate to predict the long term effects of carbon dioxide released as a result of the continued burning of fossil fuels.
by Gerald E. Marsh
The Critique builds on “A Global Warming Primer”. Like the Primer, its purpose is to help the reader determine whether our understanding of the earth’s climate is adequate to predict the long-term effects of carbon dioxide emissions from the continued burning of fossil fuels, to permit informed public policy decisions.